Re: Světový četník zplodil svého nepřítele

poslouchej dialogu, kdo te zasobuje tema prdama? chodis na nejaka skoleni a filmy? plati te kgb nebo cia?

příspěvek obsahoval nepřípustné výrazy

(Příspěvek zrušen)

příspěvek obsahoval nepřípustné výrazy

(Příspěvek zrušen)

???

Proč si myslíme, (nebo proč si myslí američané), že naše kultura a civilizace má být bezohledně šířena do celého světa. Opravdu křováci stojí o COCA-COLU a Santa Clause?

Jurasku

Komunismus se odepsal sam a to ze jej vyznavas ho nevzkrisi. Liberalni kapitalismus se bude vyvijet dal jako zatim nejlepsi system jak ekonomicky tak i socialni. Svobody ktery lidem prinasi ma takovy ohlas, ze ani arabove nedokazi odolavat jeho vlivu a nakonec pod tlakem nechaji i zensky soferovat Ty stojis na naprosto utopisticke strane a hrozne ti vadi, jako to vadilo kdysi komunistum, (ale ti aspon mohli neco trochu delat), ze amerika prave proti takovejmhle neco dela. A mohlo by te to splachnout s tim. Teda ono te to stejne splachne, protoze ta tvoje absolutne uboha vize sveta neprojde. A kdo by taky chtel takove vize s nimiz se presentuji lidi takovych kvalit jako jses ty? Hrubi, sprosti, neobjektivni, neuznavajici nazory jinych, milujicich jenom sami sebe. Vzdyt ty ani neumis slusne diskutovat. Tvoje projevy jsou snuskou blabolu, vymyslu, prekroucenych informaci a hlavne ubohych urazek, ktery nejsou ani vtipny. To uz na zakladce jsme se smali tem, kteri neumeli vymyslet ani novej for a furt se s necim opakovali. Jses proste naprosto trapnej, jak obehrana poskrabana deska bez jakychkoliv novych napadu a jen s vyrazy, ktere se mezi slusnymi lidmi nepouzivaji. Jses opravdu mozkovy impotent jurasku a ti uz nastesti nemaji moc mist, kde by mohli jit... i kdyz mozna v Severni Koreji by te jeste jako poradce potrebovali. To by mohla bejt pro tebe mekka a nezapomen tam vzit sebou nejaky pilaty a marcelly, vzdyt tam zase budete moct jezdit hrde na pionyrske tabory. Preju vam to, nic jinyho si nezaslouzite

Re: Jurasku

Co jsi chtel rict? Namluvil jsi toho jak na XV sjezdu KSC a nic se z toho jeden nedozvedel. Meles neco nema to hlavu ani patu. Pouzivas pretrepane fraze davno zde pouzite. Kdyby blbost kvetla tak jsi jak ta juraskova mandarinka. ty jsis nevsiml ze nikdo zde neobhajuje komunismus jako takovy. Tobe jeste nedoslo ze to co tu existovalo a existuje neni definitivni model spolecnosti. Tady kdyz uz se obhajuje tak je to lidstvi, ucta k zivotu, ucta k cloveku, narodu, vire a miru. Nikdo tu neobhajuje Saddama, Kima nebo Castra. Ti vsichni v histori skonci tam kde maji. (nebo taky nemaji protoze historii doposavad psal vitez). Tebe ale muzu uklidnit o tobe nikdo neskrne perem, (leda nejakej bukanyr).  

jenom par mych slov

to vyslo dnes v UK, VMM......nevim, jak je dobra tvoje anglictina, ale anglictina le carreho a hlavne jeho premysleni je "superb".......osvedcil se nejenom jako spisovatel mimoradne kvality mezinarodne, ale take jako myslitel.......takze to je moje odpoved, proc jsem ja proti valce v iraku..............rika se tomu nejspis postoj zalozeny na urcitych principech, ktere jsou mi drahe......ty jako rus muzes mit jinou mentalitu, protoze historie tve zeme je take historie expanze a podrobovani si druhych.....totez vsak platilo pro velkou britanii a je videt, ze se z teto mentality da vyrust..........

Re: jenom par mych slov

john le carre....pro vmm

The United States of America has gone mad John le Carré America has entered one of its periods of historical madness, but this is the worst can remember: worse than McCarthyism, worse than the Bay of Pigs and in the long term potentially more disastrous than the Vietnam War. The reaction to 911 is beyond anything Osama bin Laden could have hoped for in his nastiest dreams. As in McCarthy times, the freedoms that have made America the envy of the world are being systematically eroded. The combination of compliant US media and vested corporate interests is once more ensuring that a debate that should be ringing out in every town square is confined to the loftier columns of the East Coast press. The imminent war was planned years before bin Laden struck, but it was he who made it possible. Without bin Laden, the Bush junta would still be trying to explain such tricky matters as how it came to be elected in the first place; Enron; its shameless favouring of the already-too-rich; its reckless disregard for the world’s poor, the ecology and a raft of unilaterally abrogated international treaties. They might also have to be telling us why they support srael in its continuing disregard for UN resolutions. But bin Laden conveniently swept all that under the carpet. The Bushies are riding high. Now 88 per cent of Americans want the war, we are told. The US defence budget has been raised by another $60 billion to around $360 billion. A splendid new generation of nuclear weapons is in the pipeline, so we can all breathe easy. Quite what war 88 per cent of Americans think they are supporting is a lot less clear. A war for how long, please? At what cost in American lives? At what cost to the American taxpayer’s pocket? At what cost — because most of those 88 per cent are thoroughly decent and humane people — in raqi lives? How Bush and his junta succeeded in deflecting America’s anger from bin Laden to Saddam Hussein is one of the great public relations conjuring tricks of history. But they swung it. A recent poll tells us that one in two Americans now believe Saddam was responsible for the attack on the World Trade Centre. But the American public is not merely being misled. t is being browbeaten and kept in a state of ignorance and fear. The carefully orchestrated neurosis should carry Bush and his fellow conspirators nicely into the next election. Those who are not with Mr Bush are against him. Worse, they are with the enemy . Which is odd, because ’m dead against Bush, but would love to see Saddam’s downfall — just not on Bush’s terms and not by his methods. And not under the banner of such outrageous hypocrisy. The religious cant that will send American troops into battle is perhaps the most sickening aspect of this surreal war-to-be. Bush has an arm-lock on God. And God has very particular political opinions. God appointed America to save the world in any way that suits America. God appointed srael to be the nexus of America’s Middle Eastern policy, and anyone who wants to mess with that idea is a) anti-Semitic, b) anti-American, c) with the enemy, and d) a terrorist. God also has pretty scary connections. n America, where all men are equal in His sight, if not in one another’s, the Bush family numbers one President, one ex-President, one ex-head of the CA, the Governor of Florida and the ex-Governor of Texas. Care for a few pointers? George W. Bush, 1978-84: senior executive, Arbusto EnergyBush Exploration, an oil company; 1986-90: senior executive of the Harken oil company. Dick Cheney, 1995-2000: chief executive of the Halliburton oil company. Condoleezza Rice, 1991-2000: senior executive with the Chevron oil company, which named an oil tanker after her. And so on. But none of these trifling associations affects the integrity of God’s work. n 1993, while ex-President George Bush was visiting the ever-democratic Kingdom of Kuwait to receive thanks for liberating them, somebody tried to kill him. The CA believes that “somebody” was Saddam. Hence Bush Jr’s cry: “That man tried to kill my Daddy.” But it’s still not personal, this war. t’s still necessary. t’s still God’s work. t’s still about bringing freedom and democracy to oppressed raqi people. To be a member of the team you must also believe in Absolute Good and Absolute Evil, and Bush, with a lot of help from his friends, family and God, is there to tell us which is which. What Bush won’t tell us is the truth about why we’re going to war. What is at stake is not an Axis of Evil — but oil, money and people’s lives. Saddam’s misfortune is to sit on the second biggest oilfield in the world. Bush wants it, and who helps him get it will receive a piece of the cake. And who doesn’t, won’t. f Saddam didn’t have the oil, he could torture his citizens to his heart’s content. Other leaders do it every day — think Saudi Arabia, think Pakistan, think Turkey, think Syria, think Egypt. Baghdad represents no clear and present danger to its neighbours, and none to the US or Britain. Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction, if he’s still got them, will be peanuts by comparison with the stuff srael or America could hurl at him at five minutes’ notice. What is at stake is not an imminent military or terrorist threat, but the economic imperative of US growth. What is at stake is America’s need to demonstrate its military power to all of us — to Europe and Russia and China, and poor mad little North Korea, as well as the Middle East; to show who rules America at home, and who is to be ruled by America abroad. The most charitable interpretation of Tony Blair’s part in all this is that he believed that, by riding the tiger, he could steer it. He can’t. nstead, he gave it a phoney legitimacy, and a smooth voice. Now fear, the same tiger has him penned into a corner, and he can’t get out. t is utterly laughable that, at a time when Blair has talked himself agai

Re: john le carre....pro vmm.....pokracovani

against the ropes, neither of Britain’s opposition leaders can lay a glove on him. But that’s Britain’s tragedy, as it is America’s: as our Governments spin, lie and lose their credibility, the electorate simply shrugs and looks the other way. Blair’s best chance of personal survival must be that, at the eleventh hour, world protest and an improbably emboldened UN will force Bush to put his gun back in his holster unfired. But what happens when the world’s greatest cowboy rides back into town without a tyrant’s head to wave at the boys?