Něco k lepšímu

Ntpripustne zasahy iDNES

Se vsi slusnosti podotykam, ze prispevek Ghorxe od 2:25 (9.12) neobsahoval ZADNY nepripustny vyraz. Tvrdim to jako trvaly oponent Ghorxe, ktery byl timto "nepripustnym" prispevkem "napaden". Bravo, redakce!

Re: Ntpripustne zasahy iDNES

muzes ho prosim reprodukovat? ja jsem ho nestihl precist v celem zneni :-(

2 leonid

Re: 2 leonid

I begin to like Zakajev... At least he's not doing econometrics.

, Consider the paper "The Noah's Ark Problem" ("Econometrica", vol.66, issue 6, 1998) by Martin L. Weitzman, a Harvard professor, who got his Ph.D. from MIT. The abstract says: "This paper is about the economic theory of biodiversity preservation. A cost-effectiveness methodology is introduced, which results in a particular formula that can be used as a criterion to rank projects... the formula is firmly rooted in a mathematically rigorous optimization framework, so that its theoretical underpinnings are clear." So far so good. Now a few quotes from the article itself: --------------- 1) "Of the two functions, W(P) is by far the more novel or unorthodox, and the really innovative part of this paper deals with it". What is this novel and unorthodox function? Fear not, people, it's just the plain old mathematical expectation. -------------- 2) "Theorem 2: The solution of Noah's Ark Problem is an extreme policy". First of all, his usage of 'the' implies that there is only one solution, which is not true in case when two species have the same parameters. But here's the best part: the "proof". One quote says it all: "the second mixed partial of W with respect to P1 and P2 is nonpositive and independent of P1 or P2. It follows that the expected diversity function W(P) is convex in any two of its variables, holding all other arguments constant." LOL! ------------- And such people rank projects on the preservation of biodiversity. Poor animals :((((((((((

Re: I begin to like Zakajev... At least he's not doing econometrics.

, Vypada mne, ze ten muj prispevek je nejrelevantnejsi v diskuzi. 8-)

O velke lasce...

Jen tak, pro vetsi uplnost pretahnu i ja to, co jsem uvedl jako odpoved na vytku o neochote anebo neschopnosti SSSR pomoci Ceskoslovensku: 246 bombarderu a 302 stihacky v Belorusku a na Ukrajine cekali na laskavy souhlas statu, slavneho svymi vojenskymi analytiky. 21 zari 1938 Polaci pozadali Ceskoslovensko o nekolik rajonu. 22 zari SSSR pohrozil za to Polsku denonsaci paktu o neutoceni. 23 zari Rumunsko prohlasilo, ze "bude na strane Varsavy a v kazdem pripade spolek s Polskem bude mit prioritu pred povinostmi vuci Praze". 25 zari velvyslanec Polska Lukasevic rekl Bullitovi v Parizi, ze v pripade sovetske pomoci Ceskoslovensku Polsko je pripraveno na valku proti SSSR po boku s Nemeckem a "behem 3 mesicu Rusko prestane existovat jako stat".  Pokracovat v nabizeni pomoci komukoliv za podminek, kdy cela Europa se snazila postvat Hitlera proti SSSR, mohl pouze idiot.  Polsko dostalo za sve "ambice" ("od Baltu do Black Sea") jen cast toho, co  zaslouzilo. Ceskoslovensko jako vzdy zvitezilo svou prislovecnou krotosti a celou valku mirne zasobovalo Nemce munici a dely. Znalcu dejin, jak vidim, je tu dost, obzvlast znalcu selektivnych. Muj nazor: kdyby Stalin byl vetsi pragmatik, pakt typu "Molotov-Ribbentrop" by byl podepsan uz v roce 1937.

Re: O velke lasce...

O velke lasce Adolfa a Josefa

Re: O velke lasce Adolfa a Josefa

poslouchej, ivan placa uplne nesmysly, ty vsak take, co provokujes? rusove osvobodili evropu, rusove bojovali jako zadna jina armada a pokud uzavreli s ribbentropem smlouvu, tak udelali jenom tu jedine moznou vec, ktera davala smysl....ja mam jenom obdiv k tomu, co dokazali.....jaky smysl ma provokovat a dohadovat se o historii, ktera je uplne jasna......ivan je nacionalista a navic neumi vest dialog, ale ty take ne s tim detinskym provokovanim.....rusko bylo (vcetne obdobi sojuzu) skutecne imperium, neni divu, ze ivan narika nad lonskymi snehy.....stalin neplanoval zadne zapadni tazeni, to, co rikas, je naprosta kravina, kdyby to totiz planoval, mohl v 45. s armadou 2 milionu v berline smest americany a anglicany do atlantiku, totez mohl udelat na vychode s armadou 1,5 milionu, kde rusove behem dnu rozdrtili  a obklicili japonskou armadu, ktera mela 1,2 milionu......stalin to neudelal!

rusko nebo cccp?

Ivan se pozastavuje nad tim, ze Cesi nevidi rozdil mezi Ruskem a Sovetskym svazem. Jsi na omylu Ivane. Rozdil zname velmi dobre a ty jsi prikladem protoze jsi sice Rus, ale chovas se jako Sovet. A to je to, cemu my rikame svoloc. Ne Rusko, ale SSSR. Panimajes?

Re: rusko nebo cccp?

Ne, Ivan se nepozastavuje (asi nekdo jiny). Toho Soveta beru jako kompliment. A ty zustanes navzdy tim, po cem si ten svuj prispevek  vynes az na horu. Vsadim se, ze tvoje rodice nepobihali v 45-m s puskou po ulici a ty jsi jejich potomek se vsim vsude.

JURÁSEK.

    Že jsi JURÁSEK je pravdy půl,pravda celá je že jsi velký               VŮL.

Jurasek, you are being lied to...

, For example, that quote from Putin. You can see and hear Putin saying those words - http://www.newsru.com/world/12nov2002/nytimes_v_lo.html . He was talking about the danger presented by radical islamists, while addressing a French journalist: "they talk about necessity of killing all non-muslims. If you are a Christian, you are in danger. If you become an atheist, you also must by liquidated. If you convert to Islam, this will not save you either, because they think that traditional Islam is their enemy. And if you want to become a radical Islamist and make circumcision, then I invite you to Moscow. We are multi-confessional country, we have specialists who can do that. [After pause, quickly] And I will recommend to do this operation in such manner that nothing will grow from you again." As you see, this is not what you thought he said.

The best of Vladimir Putin! In Russian and English!

, When George W. Bush says some nonsense - it's a topic for a joke. If the same does Vladimir Putin - it's the evidence of his evil plots. The following are believed to be Putin's statements (I heard none of them myself): -------------------- 1) "Секс, насилие, терроризм должны быть запрещены" ('sex, violence and terrorism must be prohibited') -------------------- 2) After presidential elections in 2000: "То, как прошла избирательная кампания, избавило меня от главной необходимости - необходимости вводить в заблуждение массы населения" ('the way, in which the elections went, has spared me from my main task - having to mislead the people') -------------------- 3) About what he did after КПСС was outlawed: "Взял партбилет, учётную карточку, положил в стол, перекрестил. Всё там и лежит." ('took my party membership card, put it into a drawer, and crossed it. It's still there.')

nerozumim vam moc, ale mam sve "lidi" na prekladani

Re: nerozumim vam moc, ale mam sve

Prihraty muslim Jurasek zase zvraci.Obdivovatel O.B.Labina, rezani hlav, sekani koncetin a verejnych poprav.Sick fuck cocksucker.